Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://openscholar.ump.ac.za/handle/20.500.12714/232
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOgujiuba, Kanayo Kingsley.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-02T14:00:18Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-02T14:00:18Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttps://openscholar.ump.ac.za/handle/20.500.12714/232-
dc.descriptionPlease note that only UMP researchers are shown in the metadata. To access the co-authors, please view the full text.en_US
dc.description.abstractBRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) economic block is a strategic partnership, pursuing common interests at national and international level because it brings together the world’s fastest growing nations. Notwithstanding the partnership,macroeconomic effects across the member nations are not the same. BRICS have achieved different levels of economic growth and development, with different macroeconomic policies but the world seems to remain optimistic about their future, which is uncertain. This article compares the economic indicators across the BRICS for the period 2000 - 2015. Using desktop approach, we sourced our data from the World Bank and United Nations Publications. Statistics indicate that China and India are fast growing in term of GDP within the period, more than the other member countries. Nonetheless, China the major strength of the BRICS, survived the global financial crisis of 2008 with GDP growth just decreasing to about 9.0 percent. All other BRICS members GDP growth rates have been declining recently. Overall, the growth rates of the BRICS countries have declined tremendously after 2010 and macro aggregates are unstable. This, however, has led to negative growth in investment in fixed assets in two of the BRICS countries (Russia and Brazil). Our analysis suggest that, all BRICS members need to strive for inclusive economic growth, in order to eradicate poverty, address unemployment and promote social inclusion. New measures have become imperative if the BRICS countries are to be larger than the G6 in 50 years.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Public Enterpriseen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of International Economicsen_US
dc.subjectBRICS.en_US
dc.subjectEconomic development.en_US
dc.subjectEconomic growth.en_US
dc.subjectGross Domestic Product.en_US
dc.subjectMacroeconomic policies.en_US
dc.titleA comparative analysis of macroeconomic outcomes amongst the BRICS (2000-2015).en_US
dc.typejournal articleen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationSchool of Development Studiesen_US
dc.relation.issn0976-0792en_US
dc.description.volume11en_US
dc.description.issue1en_US
dc.description.startpage49en_US
dc.description.endpage63en_US
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextembargo_20500101-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypejournal article-
crisitem.author.deptSchool of Development Studies-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
A-comparative-analysis-of-macroeconomic-outcomes-amongst-the-BRICS.pdf
  Until 2050-01-01
Published version641.43 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

62
checked on Jun 8, 2021

Download(s)

2
checked on Jun 8, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in UMP Scholarship are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.